DISINFO: EU's decision not to procure Sputnik V is incomprehensible

DISINFORMATION CASE DETAILS

AI translations:

DISINFO: EU's decision not to procure Sputnik V is incomprehensible

SUMMARY

While the second wave of the coronavirus pandemic rages on, the EU stubbornly denies to include the Sputnik V vaccine, developed by the renowned Gamaleya Institute in the list of vaccines it is procuring against COVID-19. The EU is politicising the efforts to combat the virus while it is also threatening member states ordering the Russian vaccine with sanctions.

RESPONSE

This article is part of a pro-Kremlin disinformation campaign in support of the Russian Sputnik V vaccine against coronavirus.

It has been widely reported that tests were not completed before Russia decided to release any information about Sputnik V. Scepticism come mainly from professional and scientific circles, not from Western officials or pharmaceutical companies. Additionally, the operation of the vaccine is questioned even by specialists directly from Russia. There is also evidence that Russia has at all times perceived the development of a coronavirus vaccine mainly in terms of geopolitical and economic gain.

Currently, there are 30 vaccines in clinical trials on humans, and at least 90 preclinical vaccines are under active investigation in animals. Only recently did a US company applied to FDA for an emergency approval.

As far as it concerns the possibility that the EU will impose sanctions on member - states for procuring Sputnik V, this is simply not true. Brussels warned Hungary against using Russia's COVID-19 vaccine because such a move would raise safety concerns and could damage trust in potential shots. Additionally, Sputnik V has not been reviewed by the European Medicines Agency.

The same disinformation campaign includes statements such as "Western attacks on the Russian coronavirus vaccine are a corporate cold war against humanity" or "Russian progress in COVID-19 vaccine has become for the West an outrageous challenge".

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    Why do you not like our audio?

    it will help us to improve it

      Your opinion matters!

      Data Protection Information *

        Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

        Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

        Data Protection Information *

        The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.

        🎵 Playlist