DISINFO: Russian opposition recognises the vote for constitutional amendments

DISINFORMATION CASE DETAILS

  • Outlet: vz.ru ( archive, original )
  • Date of publication: July 02, 2020
  • Countries / regions discussed: Russia

AI translations:

DISINFO: Russian opposition recognises the vote for constitutional amendments

SUMMARY

Legally flawless, completely safe medically – and politically convincing. In such a way, regional experts evaluated the procedure and results of the vote to amendments to the Russian Constitution. It was recognised even by representatives of the Russian opposition.

RESPONSE

One of the disinformation narratives about voting on amendments to the Russian Constitution. According to the independent observers, such large-scale fraud, as during the voting on constitutional amendments, had not been seen since 2011. In just six days of voting on constitutional amendments, the movement for voter rights "Golos" received 682 messages with signs of violations. Activists identified several types of violations: abuse of authority and illegal activities of election commissions, coercion to vote, illegal campaigning by election commissions, state bodies and officials, multiple voting, ballot-box stuffing and violation of voting secrecy. The Russian opposition voiced a different opinion about the referendum. For example, Alexey Navalny said that these results "have nothing to do with the opinion of Russian citizens". He calls the vote "invalid" and "illegal". Others said that participation in the voting was meaningless because it was conceived and conducted in such a way that the organisers not only could not lose but almost manually controlled the final figures.

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    Why do you not like our audio?

    it will help us to improve it

      Your opinion matters!

      Data Protection Information *

        Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

        Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

        Data Protection Information *

        The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.

        🎵 Playlist