DISINFO: Scotland Yard recognises that there is no proof of the Kremlin’s role in the Skripals’ poisoning

DISINFORMATION CASE DETAILS

AI translations:

DISINFO: Scotland Yard recognises that there is no proof of the Kremlin’s role in the Skripals’ poisoning

SUMMARY

Police admitted that don’t have any evidence that the Russian President had played a role in this case. There was a lot of speculation about who was responsible, who gave the orders, all based on expert opinions from Russia. I need some evidence said Scotland Yard’s Deputy Chief Neil Basu.

RESPONSE

The disinformation outlet distorts the message of the publication it refers to. In fact, the Russian President is assessed by UK intelligence agencies as ‘likely’ to have approved the nerve agent attack on the Skripals, as can be read in the article. This is why Scotland Yard is also examining the role of the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, in the Novichok nerve agent attack in Salisbury, according to the Guardian. At that, no European Arrest Warrant can be issued so far against Putin, says Scotland Yard Deputy Chief Neil Basu: “You’d have to prove he [Putin] was directly involved. In order to get an EAW, you have to have a case capable of being charged in this country. We haven’t got a case capable of being charged.” Scotland Yard Deputy Chief Neil Basu states that “The whole of the investigation is still a live criminal investigation”. Two Russian intelligence officers “Petrov” and “Boshirov” (believed to be false names) have been charged by Scotland Yard with the attempted murder of the Skripals and murder of Dawn Sturgess. They will be arrested if they travel outside Russia within the European Union, Neil Basu confirmed. The two Russians charged are believed to be part of Russia’s GRU military intelligence agency. They were also charged with the use and possession of Novichok, contrary to the Chemical Weapons Act. See more disinformation cases on Skripal case here.

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    Why do you not like our audio?

    it will help us to improve it

      Your opinion matters!

      Data Protection Information *

        Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

        Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

        Data Protection Information *

        The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.

        🎵 Playlist