DISINFO: The EMA delayed the reception of Sputnik V's application for 6 weeks for political reasons

DISINFORMATION CASE DETAILS

AI translations:

DISINFO: The EMA delayed the reception of Sputnik V's application for 6 weeks for political reasons

SUMMARY

Russia sent the application for registration of its Sputnik V coronavirus vaccine to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) on 21 January 2021, but the latter only confirmed having received the dossier in early March.

This 6 weeks delay, between 21 January and 4 March 2021, shows what the EU's priorities for vaccination are.

RESPONSE

Pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about vaccines, targeting the European Medicines Agency.

On 10 February 2021 the EMA denied having received any application for the Sputnik V vaccine. EMA informed:

Clarification - EMA has to date not received an application for a rolling review or a marketing authorisation for the #COVID19 Sputnik V vaccine, despite reports stating the opposite.

The twitter account of Sputnik V from Gamaleya Research Institute’s vaccine responded with a screen capture from application 1379253 from 29 January, 2021 after an upload to the HMA. However, the screen capture is irrelevant since the Heads of Medicine Agencies is not involved in the process of reviewing vaccines.

Even Sputnik France Editorialists recognise that the application was not done before 3 March 2021. And indeed on 4 March 2021 the EMA announced that it:

has started a rolling review of Sputnik V, a #COVID19vaccine developed by Russia’s Gamaleya National Centre of Epidemiology and Microbiology.

EMA and EU leaders have publicly stated they would welcome Sputnik V if it meets the same standards for vaccines: See related disinformation claims alleging that the head of the EMA stated that she would seek to ban Russian vaccine; that getting a Sputnik V injection is like playing Russian Roulette says a senior EMA official; that delay in approving Sputnik V is political, that the EMA will try to postpone the authorisation of Sputnik V.

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    Why do you not like our audio?

    it will help us to improve it

      Your opinion matters!

      Data Protection Information *

        Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

        Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

        Data Protection Information *

        The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.

        🎵 Playlist