DISINFO: The US inadvertently legitimised Russia’s military operation in Ukraine

DISINFORMATION CASE DETAILS

  • Outlet: noticiaslatam.lat ( archive, original )
  • Date of publication: August 29, 2024
  • Article language(s): Spanish
  • Countries / regions discussed: Ukraine, Russia

AI translations:

DISINFO: The US inadvertently legitimised Russia’s military operation in Ukraine

SUMMARY

The US inadvertently legitimised Russia’s military operation in Ukraine. Press undersecretary of the US Department of Defense Sabrina Singh, by declaring that Ukrainians are defending from Russian attacks with the incursion of the Russian region of Kursk, cements the reasons for Russia’s operation in Ukraine: to defend itself from NATO.

RESPONSE

The claim is a disingenuous attempt to justify Russia’s aggression against Ukraine by establishing a false equivalence between two actions.

Allegations about the need for Russia to defend itself against NATO are baseless. Aside from the fact that Ukraine is not a NATO member, Russia’s borders with NATO countries have doubled since 2022, without provoking any significant reaction from Moscow. Russia has repeatedly moved troops away from its borders with members of the Atlantic Alliance, showing that Russian authorities are aware that NATO is a defensive block and do not fear any attack from these countries, and proving that arguments about an imminent “NATO threat” from Ukraine are nothing but pretexts based in lies.

Russia’s invasion is therefore illegal, specifically violating Article 2(4) of the UN Charter. In contrast, Ukraine is acting in self-defence, in full compliance with the Article 51 of the UN Charter. This includes the right to strike military targets in Russia involved in Moscow's campaign, and attacking Russian forces inside Ukraine including Russian military bases in the temporarily occupied Ukrainian territories such as the Donbas, Crimea and other regions belonging to Ukraine.

See other examples of similar disinformation narratives, such as claims that Putin launched the special military operation in Ukraine to protect the Russian populations of Donbas, that Russia attacked Ukraine because Kyiv broke the Minsk agreements, that Russia’s special operation prevented Ukraine’s attack, that that Russia’s special operation in Ukraine is due to NATO’s persistent expansion, or that Ukraine itself is to blame for the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    Why do you not like our audio?

    it will help us to improve it

      Your opinion matters!

      Data Protection Information *

        Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

        Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

        Data Protection Information *

        The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.

        🎵 Playlist