DISINFO: Western countries lie about Ghouta

DISINFORMATION CASE DETAILS

AI translations:

DISINFO: Western countries lie about Ghouta

SUMMARY

The UN final report on what is known as the Ghouta massacre on August 21, 2013 does not reveal its perpetrator.

In addition, a MIT study from February 2014 explains that the attack was launched from a so-called rebel area.

This is not to say that Bashar El Assad did not perpetrate any chemical attack. This is to emphasise that once again, Western governments have lied to their people to bring down their enemies.

RESPONSE

Recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives attempting to cast doubt on who is responsible for the 2013 chemical attacks in Syria and questioning the integrity of Western governments by accusing them of lying systematically to the public to bring down countries that resist them.

The Ghouta attack was investigated by a UN Mission set up by the UN Secretary General, and its findings were contained in a report published in September 2013. The OPCW and the WHO played an important but auxiliary role throughout the process (ibid., p. 4).

The report written by Richard Lloyd, former UN weapons Inspector, and Theodore Postol, professor at MIT, doesn't prove that the shells were fired by the rebels rather than the Syrian Army. The short range vectors were able to reach 2.5-3.5 kilometres. As Bellingcat states, the Syrian Army was between 2 and 3 km from the impact points. It makes sense that the chemical weapons were fired from the frontline rather than far inside the lines to reduce the risk of reach one own troops.

However, according to the British Joint Intelligence Organisation, "it is highly likely that the regime was responsible for the CW attacks."

Read also related stories: Terrorists plan false flag chemical attacks in Syria, Damascus facing unfounded accusations regarding the use of chemical weapons, West uses Goebbels' methods to put pressure on Syria.

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    Why do you not like our audio?

    it will help us to improve it

      Your opinion matters!

      Data Protection Information *

        Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

        Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

        Data Protection Information *

        The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.

        🎵 Playlist