DISINFO: White House admits there is no evidence of Russian interference in US elections

DISINFORMATION CASE DETAILS

AI translations:

DISINFO: White House admits there is no evidence of Russian interference in US elections

SUMMARY

The White House admits there is no evidence of a supposed “Russian influence” in US elections. National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan admitted on 25 February that the US has no evidence that the Russian government is trying to interfere in the upcoming elections of next November as some Western media have speculated.

RESPONSE

This is a disingenuous distortion of the original NBC interview with US National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, who after being asked about evidence of Russian interference in the upcoming November 2024 election said: “I can’t speak of evidence today, but I can tell you of course there are concerns”. The sentence may be ambiguous, but by no means is an “admission that there is no evidence”, contrary to what this disinformation story claims.

Further, the headline of this disinformation story is deliberately misleading in order to suggest that there was no Russian interference in any earlier US election even if the question was only about 2024. There is a massive corpus of evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 election, compiled in the two-volume Mueller report and the five-volume US Senate investigation. The US Community of Intelligence also assessed publicly in 2021 that Russia tried to influence the 2020 election and sow divisions in the US.

See other examples of similar disinformation narratives, such as claims that the US never presented evidence of Russia’s involvement in election interference or cyberattacks, that Russiagate was a fraud orchestrated by the West, that US maintains sanctions on Russia even though accusations of interference proved to be unfounded, or that the Mueller report is another proof of how Russia is always falsely accused.

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    Why do you not like our audio?

    it will help us to improve it

      Your opinion matters!

      Data Protection Information *

        Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

        Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

        Data Protection Information *

        The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.

        🎵 Playlist