Paint it camouflage

Key Takeaways

  • Pro-Kremlin disinformation misleadingly alleges ceasefire talks between Ukraine and the US in Jeddah resulted in a 'humiliating capitulation' by Ukraine. In reality, the ball has been firmly placed in the Kremlin’s court, challenging Moscow to prove its interest in peace.
  • Pro-Kremlin outlets falsely claimed that the EU’s defence policies are offensive and aim to attack Russia. The EU’s defence policies explicitly respond to Russia’s continued aggressive behaviour, including its unprovoked invasion of Ukraine.
  • The Kremlin is inherently aggressive towards any enhanced defensive capability from other countries. Its disinformation campaigns seek to intimidate audiences into not supporting defensive measures against Russian aggression.


Note: This section is auto-generated based on the article content.

Click here to request the narration for this article

When the truth is inconvenient, camouflage it. Pro-Kremlin disinformation paints ceasefire talks as total capitulation, defence as aggression, and democracy as conspiracy.

Tuesday, 11 March negotiations in Jeddah between the Ukrainian and American delegations resulted in a joint statement announcing, among other things, a 30-day ceasefire proposal in Ukraine pending Russia’s acceptance and concurrent implementation. The European Union welcomed the statement, expressed its readiness ‘to play its full part in supporting the upcoming steps,’ and urged ‘Russia to show its willingness to achieve peace.’ Russia returned the kindness by launching yet another large overnight missile attack on cities across Ukraine.

Once a spoiler, always a spoiler

However, pro-Kremlin outlets lost no time framing the initial outcome of US-Ukraine talks as a ‘humiliating capitulation’ by Ukraine. Russian state and pro-Kremlin outlet like RIA and Vzglyad claimed that Zelenskyy had ‘surrendered completely to American demands’, portraying Ukraine as having no independent agency and emphasising that the ceasefire conditions ultimately depend on Russia’s approval.

Despite the pro-Kremlin ecosystem’s attempts to distort the stakes prior to the Jeddah talks, drive a wedge between Ukraine and its supporters by misrepresenting potential peace terms, and portray Russia as having an out-of-proportion importance in the peace process, some Russian voices were warier of the outcomes. After all, Russia does not appear to hold the strongest cards for upcoming negotiations, nor is it in the driver’s seat. We shall soon see what Russia truly wants.

Russia’s twisted neighbourhood watch

In Russia’s zero-sum worldview, the enhanced defence capabilities of its neighbours represent a direct threat to Russia, as they threaten Russia’s ability to dominate through intimidation and brutal aggression.

This week, we witnessed pro-Kremlin information manipulators escalate their campaign to portray the European Union as a militaristic entity intent on marching against Russia. Disinformation outlets falsely claimed the EU Commission’s ‘ReArm Europe’ plan, designed to strengthen Europe’s defensive capabilities primarily to defend Europe against Russian belligerence, was apparently preparation for an attack against Russia. For the Kremlin, once again, defence is offense and war is peace. The absurdity reached new heights when Pravda’s propagandists claimed that Europeans would be taught ‘how to die’ for this supposed offensive war.

The Third Reich yet again, really?

In reality, the EU’s defence policies explicitly respond to Russia’s continued aggressive behaviour, including its unprovoked invasion of Ukraine.

The EU’s increased defence spending and strategic autonomy initiatives are defensive in nature, motivated by Russia’s ongoing threats to European security. By intentionally distorting these facts and invoking historical scare tactics, like Belarusian Sputnik did by equating the EU’s actions with those of Napoleon or Nazi Germany, Kremlin narratives seek to frighten domestic audiences and justify Russia’s militaristic stance.

Mirror, mirror on the wall

This latest wave of pro-Kremlin disinformation aligns with the broader Kremlin narrative attempting to undermine EU unity and coherence.

By conjuring a false equivalency between European defence policies and aggressive intent, such as launching pre-emptive attacks on Russia, and invoking distorted historical comparisons, pro-Kremlin narratives further seek to intimidate Russian domestic audiences as well as to scare European audiences into abandoning support for EU defensive measures and support to Ukraine.

In doing so, the pro-Kremlin propagandists aim to shift blame away from Russia’s own military expansionism and onto the EU, presenting Moscow as a victim rather than as an aggressor. Accepting this false narrative risks weakening the West’s unified response to Russia’s on-going aggression.

Don’t Be Deceived.

Also spotted on the EUvsDisinfo’s radar this week:

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    Why do you not like our audio?

    it will help us to improve it

      Your opinion matters!

      Data Protection Information *

        Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

        Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

        Data Protection Information *

        The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.

        🎵 Playlist